![]() |
What to do if you shoot someone in self-defense
I was shown an article here: http://glocktalk.com/showthread.php?threadid=720545
about what to say and how to behave to police after you are forced to shoot someone in self defense. I think information like this is invaluable. Does anyone here have any additional advice on this? Just how does one get a lawyer? I don't have some personal lawyer watching my back... I figured that privilege was exclusive to the uber wealthy |
Re: What to do if you shoot someone in self-defense
My advice would be not to write on the Internet how you plan to handle it if you ever have to shoot someone in self-defense. If you ever really do have to, and the case goes to court, it wouldn't look so great to have a prosecuting attorney show up with your scripted answers to the LEOs questions in-hand.
|
Re: What to do if you shoot someone in self-defense
Interesting discussion. The thing that strikes me as interesting is the way the discussion assumes that all cops are the same. There are many different types of departments (city, county, state, federal), and within those departments there are different types of cops. I think it would do well to assess the type of cop and jurisdiction with which you are dealing.
For instance, I know my town's police force personally. It is a small town, and there are only 8 of them. About half of them I have a great relationship with. When I see them around town we always smile and wave, or stop and talk. If I was involved in a deadly shooting I would specifically request to talk to a city officer. I would simply say that I felt more comfortable talking with someone I knew - and I do. That's not to say that I wouldn't be extremely careful and selective with my words... PS - Next time I'm in a social setting with the Chief of Police in my town I will ask him his opinion of what a self-defense shooter should do when the police arrive at the scene. I will also ask him if an unwillingness to talk may be construde as guilt. |
Re: What to do if you shoot someone in self-defense
From the link:
Quote:
|
Re: What to do if you shoot someone in self-defense
Quote:
|
Re: What to do if you shoot someone in self-defense
The advice on the glocktalk page jibes with what a superior court judge once told me.
A good serviceable strategy, easy to remember, is to avoid saying anything at all. I cringe every time I watch a cop show on television, with long, multi-page scenes of the cops interrogating suspects. If the suspects would just STFU, as is their right, many plots would go nowhere. Guilty people benefit little by talking to the cops. Innocent people benefit not at all. |
Re: What to do if you shoot someone in self-defense
Quote:
good advice. the key to the whole thing, and the words that best reflect it are: "I was in fear of my life." Simple as that. |
Re: What to do if you shoot someone in self-defense
hiring a lawyer is nothing you can realistically do in this situation. but by saying that you want to talk to your lawyer, that comments cuts off their ability to question you under the fifth amendment laws like miranda. but if you're not in custody they can keep on talking to you, and if you dont answer something they may take you into custody when they might otherwise not. if it is in your house though, they probably will just detain you rather than arrest you.
you want to have a relationship with a lawyer, then go out and meet one. they are all over the place. they have families, go to churches, what have you. ask around to your friends and family. this is however a specialized area, that of criminal law. not all lawyers do crimnal law. mostly the guys who do personal injury plaintiff or traffic misdemeanor and DUI are the ones to talk to about this, not joe corporate. about the cheapest way to strike up a personal relationship with a regular lawyer is to hire one to do your last will and testament. |
Re: What to do if you shoot someone in self-defense
That or you could live in a state such as Florida that has an AWESOME castle doctrine law!
Florida "Castle Doctrine" Protects the Innocent Puts Judiciary on the side of crime victims News media gets it completely wrong On March 23, 2005, The Florida Senate passed SB-436, the "Castle Doctrine" unanimously, by a vote of 39 YEAS to zero NAYS. They know something about this bill. On April 5, The Florida House passed SB-436, "Castle Doctrine" by a vote of 94 YEAS to 20 NAYS, a margin of better than four to one. On April 26, Governor Jeb Bush SIGNED SB-436, the "Castle Doctrine" into law (Chapter No. 2005-27) It takes effect on October 1, 2005. The news media nationwide started in immediately with its �Gunshine State,� blood in the streets, Dirty Harry, vigilante, irrational mass murder nonsense, mythologies, lies and blatant unethical behavior. A great deal of erroneous information has been written, published and spoken about Florida's new "Castle Doctrine" law. Claims that the new law will turn Florida into the Wild West are not only an insult to intelligent people but give a patently false portrait of what the bill actually does. The Florida "Castle Doctrine" law basically does three things: One: It establishes, in law, the presumption that a criminal who forcibly enters or intrudes into your home or occupied vehicle is there to cause death or great bodily harm, therefore a person may use any manner of force, including deadly force, against that person. Two: It removes the "duty to retreat" if you are attacked in any place you have a right to be. You no longer have to turn your back on a criminal and try to run when attacked. Instead, you may stand your ground and fight back, meeting force with force, including deadly force, if you reasonably believe it is necessary to prevent death or great bodily harm to yourself or others. [This is an American right repeatedly recognized in Supreme Court gun cases.] Three: It provides that persons using force authorized by law shall not be prosecuted for using such force. It also prohibits criminals and their families from suing victims for injuring or killing the criminals who have attacked them. In short, it gives rights back to law-abiding people and forces judges and prosecutors who are prone to coddling criminals to instead focus on protecting victims. SO -- is this the impression you got from the news? Why not? Aren�t media people impartial purveyors of objective facts, with no bias or spin, faithfully and accurately reporting the news? Everyone who believes that�s an accurate description of the news media please raise your hand. See? No hands go up. Despite their protests otherwise, the news media has, in general, and especially with respect to gun issues, become an outrageous purveyor of agenda-driven nonsense on the dark side of the force. |
Re: What to do if you shoot someone in self-defense
Is it safe to assume someone breaking into your house didn't tell his family and friends where he was headed that night? I would probably not call the police at all.
|
Re: What to do if you shoot someone in self-defense
Quote:
|
Re: What to do if you shoot someone in self-defense
Quote:
|
Re: What to do if you shoot someone in self-defense
Lawyer up and say you don't know nothin' 'bout nothin'.
|
Re: What to do if you shoot someone in self-defense
Take the opportunity to stock the freezer.
|
Re: What to do if you shoot someone in self-defense
Quote:
You have a right to remain silent, so use it. Shut up until you appear before the judge. Anything you tell the cops will be used in court when the cops testify against you as prosecution witnesses. Keeping your mouth shut is the single most important thing when you are being charged. I once was questioned by the police after having an argument with some nutty woman, first thing they did was to ask me (very friendly), "So, what happened?". Silly me, I confessed to everything. The cops are not your friends. They will read you your Miranda rights AFTER they get all the information from you, and then testify against you in court. Never say a word until you appear before the judge. |
Re: What to do if you shoot someone in self-defense
I have been screwed over once by a policeman (a detective wearing blues) before, who was actually taking a statement for court over a traffic offense without my knowledge, and I am not person of bad character.
The statement was ridiculous, and painted me as some sort of moron, he even messed up the grammar to change the meaning of my original statement in an attempt to incriminate me. Luckily the judge fined me $100 for the infringement, and no court appearance was necessary, I made sure I paid the fine. I said very little on that occasion, and I plan on saying even less next time. That little event destroyed any remaining trust I had in the police being objective. As for a shooting, well it's a very serious event, particularly if someone died. I would simply tell the police that I'm too shocked to speak about anything, but I'm happy to talk to them about what transpired with my lawyer there, and only after I've had a few mugs of hot chocolate and consulted with my legal counsel. If you are involved in a shooting (or any reasonably serious event), in self-defense or whatever, and you don't get a lawyer to present your case, you are a prized idiot, and you will likely get drawn over the coals and hung out to dry. I discovered that filling prisons is an industry, with quotas to be met, and one I don't intend to participate in. When dealing with the police, innocent or not, your mouth is your worst enemy. Learn to control it. |
Re: What to do if you shoot someone in self-defense
Quote:
But what's in it for you? :banghead: |
Re: What to do if you shoot someone in self-defense
Quote:
You get your story straight with him, then present it to the police. That means you tell the lawyer what really happened. It's pointless lying to your lawyer, or he can't defend you properly. If you have already been arrested, read your rights and have blabbed in the meantime, the police can use it against you. The court will also look poorly on anyone that sits there and doesn't say anything during an interview, and there will be a presumption of guilt. If you let the police interview you without a lawyer present, you are asking to get grilled, and you could well end up saying something you regret later. The lawyer in fact should interject, and tell you if you should answer something that might incriminate you, he can't tell you what to say, but he can help prevent you answering a loaded question. This is why cops hate having a lawyer present. They have to prove you have done something, opening your mouth and directly incriminating yourself is not good evidence, and is not something to engage in. There have been a lot of cases of people being bullied into confessions for crimes they were not responsible for, and I'm sure a lawyer was never present. http://www.abanet.org/publiced/pract...on_lawyer.html Of course the lawyer makes money off you, that is a trade off for his services. His job is to represent your interests, keep you out of prison, or minimise your fine/sentence/punishment. If it's serious enough to get interrogated by the police, I would say it's serious enough to pay for a good lawyer, or at least get a public defender. |
Re: What to do if you shoot someone in self-defense
Quote:
The court will then look at other evidence and witness statements instead and base their case around that, if you don't say anything in your defense then the prosecution will bring up the fact that you appeared evasive or unwilling to say anything during the interview. The court will increase any punishment accordingly, (often to maximum sentence) if you are found guilty, as you have been uncooperative and made their job harder. That is the trade off. |
Re: What to do if you shoot someone in self-defense
Here is a relevant case - Vera Stretz trial in 1936. She got acquitted of murder, jury decided it was 'justifiable homicide'. She refused to talk to the police, hired lawyer, and wouldn't tell what happened until she appeared before the judge. Since it was the first and only time she talked, no disrepancies were found between her testimony and what she told the police, neighbors, etc. I am not even sure what she told the judge was true, it could be just a lie that her lawyer instructed her to tell...
Compare it to any case where the person opened his mouth, like Miranda case. Or Martha Stewart. The policeman is not going to appear before judge and testify that you didn't talk to him, and that it's evidence of your guilt. That's just silly. Here is a good program to listen to, go to link below and find "Great American trials" in May 2004 archives - http://georgegordon.org/Radio_Archives.htm#Archives |
Re: What to do if you shoot someone in self-defense
Quote:
An unusual case. I would say that the police would definately mention to the judge via the prosecutor, that you were able to talk and walk around after arrest or when taken in for questioning, yet when taken into the interview room you clammed up. Of course the judge is meant to look at that objectively, but it will seem as if you are hiding something. The prosecutor is definately going to be fishing for such information to build a case against you. You are right, in that saying nothing in an interview or interrogation means you aren't going to implicate yourself, but then you are not building any sort of case, are appearing very evasive, and when it goes to court you better come out with something astounding that matches what everyone else says happened. Odds are the police are not going to tell you anything either if you try the silent treatment, that's because they know people are curious by nature, and will try to break the silence to get more information. During the interview with a lawyer present, or even by yourself, you could ask the police to clarify things, of course, they can choose to reveal whatever they want, and this may give a hint about what you are facing in terms of the charges, and why. It's a place to potentially trade information that can help your legal counsel, or yourself. You might get a better picture of what actually transpired, and how guilty you look. You could ask them what you are charged with, what the outcome could be if found guilty, etc. Most people probably go into an interview in a state of shock. For criminals, the fact they got caught and are likely going down for something. For innocent folk, the fact they are even in a police station after some traumatic event. Both types of people will generally waive the right to a lawyer etc. and spill the beans, unless they know how the system works. |
Re: What to do if you shoot someone in self-defense
Quote:
SCREW what the "Court" thinks!!! Your fate is in the hands of the JURY! I am speaking from personal experience here. I was charged with 2<SUP>nd</SUP> degree murder 5 years ago. I shot a man in his left eye, killing him, after he knocked me down with his fist and was coming after me again. A bystander called the cops. When the cops got there I told them "I was the one they wanted", that�s all. When questioned at the scene and later at the police station all I said was "I was afraid for my life" and "I need to talk to an attorney". I was arrested and posted bond. There were several witnesses. The cops questioned all of them. Some of the witnesses were taken to the police station for more questions. The DA tried to get one of the witnesses to change his story (this was brought out at the trial). The only person I told my story to was my lawyer and the jury when I was on trial. I was found NOT GUILTY. THE COPS ARE NOT YOUR FRIENDS!!!!! Never talk to them about ANYTHING!!!!! They WILL twist ANYTHING YOU SAY against you!!!! |
Re: What to do if you shoot someone in self-defense
Quote:
|
Re: What to do if you shoot someone in self-defense
Quote:
|
Re: What to do if you shoot someone in self-defense
Quote:
I didn't realise that you could make a statement to the police just through a lawyer though. I thought they would want to question you directly with a lawyer present. Sorry to hear you had to shoot someone. As for the cops twisting your words, I have direct experience of that, after a statement (which I didn't realise I was giving) was misused against me, which could have turned a relatively minor traffic offense, into something a lot worse. Thankfully the court didn't regard it as a massive deal. I'm not sure why the cop chose to do that, I guess they thought it was serious enough to get a statement. If a friendly policeman shows up, I'm going to tell him nothing that might incriminate me in future, I've learnt that lesson. I could have been facing a hefty fine in the thousands possibly. The vehicle I was driving was unregistered and was involved in a minor acident, due to the fact I hadn't received the registration papers, therefore the vehicle didn't have the state government insurance on it either. The vehicle was however insured with an insurance company. However, the onus was on the driver to make sure the vehicle is registered, or not to drive it regardless, so my reason for not registering it, didn't fly. In essence, the vehicle registration process is just another tax, although it carries an insurance liability to protect you financially. In some states they can take your license or give you 12 months jail time, which is just incredible really... I'd definately let them take the license... There are so many unregistered drivers getting around here, that they stopped prosecuting them back in 2001 and are considering issuing infringement notices to fine and make people cough up for registration/insurance. |
Re: What to do if you shoot someone in self-defense
Quote:
|
Re: What to do if you shoot someone in self-defense
I recall reading a piece of advice that you should shoot to kill, because if you wound the guy, he will testify against you in court, his lawyer will twist the whole thing, you may end up paying his medical bills and disability, etc...
So to answer your question, if you shoot someone and the bastard is still alive, keep shooting. :yippee: |
Re: What to do if you shoot someone in self-defense
Quote:
http://www.angelfire.com/oh/chelle26/BADGE.gif http://www.angelfire.com/oh/chelle26/handcuffs1gold.gif http://www.angelfire.com/oh5/kopspla...on_motorcy.gif http://www.angelfire.com/oh5/kopspla...s/tactical.gif |
Re: What to do if you shoot someone in self-defense
Quote:
|
Re: What to do if you shoot someone in self-defense
Couple of other things I have learned besides not saying anything to the cops:
One of the main pistol stances I learned (from several of the classes I have taken) was one where you take a step back. The reason for the step back (instead of forward or out to the side), is that you are now on the "defensive" ie moving away from the agressor, instead of becoming the agressor. Looks better in court. Also another good tip. After shooting the intruder, shoot a couple of rounds into the floor or ceiling. It makes the case that you were frightened and the victim. Here in Colorado we have a "Make My Day" law. Basically you can shoot any intruder into your home in self defense. But it does have some caveats, and has not always stood up in court (IIRC). Statute Text: (1) The general assembly hereby recognizes that the citizens of Colorado have a right to expect absolute safety within their own homes. (2) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 18-1-704, any occupant of a dwelling is justified in using any degree of physical force, including deadly physical force, against another person when that other person has made an unlawful entry into the dwelling, and when the occupant has a reasonable belief that such other person has committed a crime in the dwelling in addition to the uninvited entry, or is committing or intends to commit a crime against a person or property in addition to the uninvited entry, and when the occupant reasonably believes that such other person might use any physical force, no matter how slight, against any occupant. (3) Any occupant of a dwelling using physical force, including deadly physical force, in accordance with the provisions of subsection (2) of this section shall be immune from criminal prosecution for the use of such force. (4) Any occupant of a dwelling using physical force, including deadly physical force, in accordance with the provisions of subsection (2) of this section shall be immune from any civil liability for injuries or death resulting from the use of such force. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:15 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright = None use it and Link to GIM